top of page

Hundreds of Hezbollah pagers exploded simultaneously across Lebanon, killing 9 and injuring 2,750. The explosions' cause is unknown, but theories include hacked radio networks and supply chain tampering. The incident reveals potential flaws in otherwise secure communication methods.

A soldier on duty near American University of Beirut Medical Center after 2,750 people, including Hezbollah fighters and medics, were wounded when the pagers they use to communicate exploded simultaneously across Lebanon on September 17, 2024
Credit: Reuters

In an unexpected turn of events, hundreds of pagers belonging to the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah exploded across Lebanon on September 17, 2024. According to Lebanese security services and the health minister, the incident killed at least nine people and injured 2,750 others.


The explosions, which began at 4:45 p.m. and lasted about an hour, marked a new chapter in one of the region's longest-running conflicts. Among the dead were two Hezbollah fighters and Mohammad Mahdi Ammar, the son of Hezbollah MP Ali Ammar. Mojtaba Amani, Iran's ambassador to Lebanon, was also injured in the explosions. An eight-year-old girl has been identified among the dead.


Pagers, small communication devices that display short text messages relayed by radio frequency, have been favoured by groups like Hezbollah for their perceived security advantages. Unlike mobile phones, pagers operate on radio waves, making them theoretically harder to monitor.


Lebanese Civil Defense first-responders carry a man who was wounded when his handheld pager exploded in the southern port city of Sidon on September 17, 2024
Credit: AP Photo

The exact cause of the explosions remains unknown, but speculation is rife. Some experts suggest that the radio network used by the pagers may have been hacked, triggering a response within potentially compromised devices. Data analyst Ralph Baydoun told Al Jazeera, "What I think happened [is that] every Hezbollah [member] who was at a specific level was attacked."


Others, like former British army officer and chemical weapons expert Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, proposed that the pagers may have been tampered with along the supply chain and "wired to explode on command".


The technical specifics of how a pager could explode are still being debated. One theory suggests that if the pager's lithium battery was triggered to overheat, it could initiate a process called thermal runaway, leading to a violent explosion. However, triggering such a reaction in multiple devices not connected to the internet presents significant technical challenges.


Hezbollah has pointed the finger at Israel, stating, "We hold the Israeli enemy fully responsible for this criminal aggression." However, Israel has remained characteristically silent on the matter.

 
  • Hundreds of Hezbollah pagers exploded simultaneously across Lebanon, killing 9 and injuring 2,750.

  • The cause of the explosions is unknown, but theories range from hacked radio networks to supply chain tampering.

  • The incident exposes potential vulnerabilities in supposedly secure communication methods.


Source: ALJAZEERA


Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) study shows increased driver distraction with partial automation systems. Tesla's Autopilot and Volvo's Pilot Assist were the focus of the research. Drivers were found to engage in non-driving activities more frequently when using these systems.


 Tesla Model 3
Credit: REUTERS

The research, conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), suggests that drivers are more prone to engaging in non-driving activities when these systems are active, potentially compromising road safety.


The month-long study focused on two popular partial automation systems: Tesla's Autopilot and Volvo's Pilot Assist. Researchers examined how driver behaviour evolved over time when using these technologies, which are designed to assist with routine driving tasks such as maintaining speed and staying centred in a lane.


IIHS President David Harkey emphasised the importance of the findings, stating, "These results are a good reminder of the way people learn. If you train them to think that paying attention means nudging the steering wheel every few seconds, then that's exactly what they'll do."


The study involving Tesla's Autopilot included 14 participants who collectively drove over 12,000 miles with the system engaged. During this time, the system triggered 3,858 attention-related warnings. On average, drivers responded within three seconds, typically by nudging the steering wheel, which usually prevented further escalation of the warning.


In the case of Volvo's Pilot Assist, 29 volunteers participated in the study. Researchers found that drivers were distracted for a staggering 30% of the time while using the system. The study's authors described this level of distraction as "exceedingly high".


These findings come at a time when major automakers are racing to develop and deploy partial automation technologies. While the goal is to make driving easier and safer, the study highlights potential risks associated with these systems. The rush to implement such technologies has already sparked concerns and litigation surrounding driver distraction and related accidents.


Harkey stressed the need for improved safeguards, saying, "In both these studies, drivers adapted their behaviour to engage in distracting activities. This demonstrates why partial automation systems need more robust safeguards to prevent misuse."


Partial automation systems, classified as a level of "advanced driver assistance systems", utilise cameras, sensors, and software to regulate vehicle speed based on surrounding traffic and maintain lane positioning. Some systems even offer automatic lane-changing capabilities.


Despite these advanced features, it's crucial to note that drivers are still required to continuously monitor the road and be prepared to take control at any moment. Most systems mandate that drivers keep their hands on the steering wheel as a safety measure.

 

• IIHS study shows increased driver distraction with partial automation systems

• Tesla's Autopilot and Volvo's Pilot Assist were the focus of the research

• Drivers were found to engage in non-driving activities more frequently when using these systems


Source: REUTERS


France enacts LOPMI law, targeting tech executives for crimes on their platforms. Telegram CEO Pavel Durov under formal investigation, facing potential 10-year sentence. Law's effectiveness yet to be tested in court, raising questions about its impact.


Founder and CEO of Telegram Pavel Durov
Credit: REUTERS

The LOPMI law, enacted in January 2023, has thrust France into the spotlight as a frontrunner in the global fight against crime-ridden websites. This unprecedented legislation has already led to the formal investigation of Telegram's CEO, Pavel Durov, marking a significant milestone in the country's efforts to hold tech giants accountable.


The LOPMI law introduces a novel offence: "Complicity in the administration of an online platform to allow an illicit transaction, in an organised gang". This charge carries severe penalties, including a maximum 10-year prison sentence and a €500,000 fine. The law's uniqueness has caught the attention of legal experts worldwide, with many noting the absence of comparable legislation in other jurisdictions.


Pavel Durov, currently out on bail, vehemently denies allegations that Telegram is an 'anarchic paradise'. The messaging platform maintains its compliance with EU laws and argues against the notion that a platform or its owner should be held responsible for user misconduct. However, French authorities remain steadfast in their pursuit, viewing the LOPMI law as a powerful tool in their arsenal against organised crime groups increasingly operating in the digital realm.


The law's effectiveness is yet to be tested in court, raising questions about its potential impact and enforceability. Legal experts draw comparisons to high-profile cases in the United States, such as the conviction of Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the Silk Road website. However, they emphasise the crucial difference: the French law does not require proof of intent or active facilitation of criminal activities by platform operators.


French cyber law professor Michel Séjean explains that the toughened legislation stems from authorities' frustration with uncooperative platforms like Telegram. The law aims to empower prosecutors in their dealings with tech companies that have previously been difficult to hold accountable.


The LOPMI law is part of a broader legislative push in France to tackle cybercrime. In November 2023, another law was passed, granting authorities the power to geolocate suspects of serious crimes by remotely activating their devices. These measures have positioned France at the forefront of the global fight against cybercrime, as evidenced by Durov's arrest on French soil.


The Paris prosecutor's office's J3 cybercrime unit, armed with these new legislative tools, has already made significant strides in high-profile cases. In June, they shut down Coco, an anonymous chat forum linked to over 23,000 legal proceedings involving serious crimes such as prostitution, rape and homicide.

 

• France enacts LOPMI law, targeting tech executives for crimes on their platforms

• Telegram CEO Pavel Durov under formal investigation, facing potential 10-year sentence

• Law's effectiveness yet to be tested in court, raising questions about its impact


Source: REUTERS

bottom of page