Four public universities in Singapore are using artificial intelligence (AI) tools to grade student work that contributes to their final scores. Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), National University of Singapore (NUS), and Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) employ AI for assessments. In contrast, Singapore Management University (SMU) and the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) do not permit AI use for grading due to concerns about accuracy and reliability.

Lecturers at NTU and SUTD use an AI tool called Gradescope to mark technical workings on mathematics and physics paper scripts. Gradescope scans handwritten answers and groups similar ones, enabling human examiners to assign the same grade to students with comparable workings. This batch assigning method helps save human examiners time.
SIT developed an internal platform, AI-Orate, which created a chatbot to quiz food technology degree undergraduates. The chatbot assesses their understanding of food manufacturing processes, grading them based on answers and asking follow-up questions to explore concepts further. It then generates a transcript of the conversation with a recommended grade.
Approximately 50 students participated in one of the few runs of AI-Orate in October 2025. During this, students wrote code to program an industrial machine for heat processing, predicting microbial reaction rates at varying temperatures. The chatbot then quizzed them on their reasoning, and follow-up questions were used to delve into their responses.
Christian Wolfrum, NTU’s deputy president and provost, stated that their approach improves grading consistency and efficiency, with all grading decisions remaining with the instructor. Ashraf Kassim, SUTD’s associate provost of education and innovation, described AI as a supporting partner to the instructor.
Associate Professor Wong Shin Yee, programme leader for SIT’s Bachelor of Food Technology with Honours programme, noted that the chatbot can reduce time-consuming face-to-face assessments from one week to about two days. Professor Wong highlighted the potential for creating highly customisable assessments in large classes where personalised questioning is often impossible. Professor Wong added that chatbots can evaluate individual student understanding in group submissions.
Associate Professor Karin Avnit, deputy director at SIT’s Teaching and Learning Academy, stated that the adaptive nature of the discussion allows students to demonstrate their competence.
All AI-generated grades at NTU, SUTD, NUS, and SIT must be reviewed by teachers. Students must be informed when AI is used for assessments that contribute to the year’s final grade. Students may also request a review of their results.
National University of Singapore (NUS) permits AI use only if the tool has been validated for accuracy and approved by the relevant head of department or deanery. This approval occurs under a university forum that sets AI application standards.
Broader discussions around AI’s role in higher education surfaced in 2025 when NTU penalised three students for their use of AI in assignments. While all six universities generally allow students to use generative AI to varying degrees, students must declare when and how they use such tools for academic integrity.
Four Singaporean public universities—NTU, SUTD, NUS, and SIT—utilise AI tools for grading student work, while SMU and SUSS do not.
AI tools include Gradescope for batch grading handwritten answers and AI-Orate’s chatbot for interactive quizzes and conceptual drilling.
Universities cite improved grading consistency, efficiency, reduced assessment time, and potential for customisable assessments as benefits.
Source: STRAITSTIMES

