Instagram Chief Disputes Claims of Social Media Addiction in Landmark Trial

Adam Mosseri, the head of Meta's Instagram, recently testified in a significant social media trial in Los Angeles, asserting his disagreement with the notion that individuals can be clinically addicted to social media platforms. This trial is pivotal as it seeks to hold social media companies accountable for the potential harms inflicted on children using their services. The case primarily involves a 20-year-old plaintiff, referred to only by the initials "KGM," whose lawsuit could set a precedent for numerous similar cases against social media firms.

Girl Browsing Social Media

Mosseri's testimony comes amidst a backdrop where Meta and Google's YouTube are the remaining defendants, following settlements with TikTok and Snap. The core of the trial revolves around the impact of social media on young users, with the plaintiffs arguing that these platforms contribute to various mental health issues. Mosseri emphasised the importance of distinguishing between clinical addiction and what he termed "problematic use," which he described as spending excessive time on Instagram without feeling good about it.

During the proceedings, Mosseri acknowledged that while he does not consider social media use to be an addiction, he understands that problematic usage can occur. He stated, "It's not good for the company, over the long run, to make decisions that profit for us but are poor for people's well-being." This statement reflects a growing concern within the tech industry regarding the balance between user safety and corporate profit.

The trial has also seen intense scrutiny over Instagram's features, particularly cosmetic filters that alter users' appearances. Mosseri defended the platform's approach, stating that they aim to be as safe as possible while also avoiding excessive censorship. However, the courtroom witnessed emotional reactions from parents of children who have faced challenges related to social media, particularly concerning body image issues exacerbated by these filters.

In response to questions about the financial motivations behind targeting younger users, Mosseri clarified that Instagram generates less revenue from teenagers compared to other demographics, as they often lack disposable income and do not engage with ads as frequently. This assertion was met with counterarguments from the plaintiff's lawyer, who highlighted research indicating that early social media engagement can lead to prolonged usage, making young users valuable for long-term profitability.

Mosseri concluded his testimony by reiterating that prioritising user safety is not only ethically sound but also beneficial for business in the long run. The trial continues to unfold, with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg expected to testify in the coming days, further illuminating the ongoing debate surrounding social media's role in the lives of young people.

As the case progresses, it raises critical questions about the responsibilities of tech companies in safeguarding their users, particularly vulnerable populations like children and teenagers. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the future of social media regulation and corporate accountability.

• Adam Mosseri disputes the idea of clinical addiction to social media during a landmark trial.

• The case could set a precedent for numerous lawsuits against social media companies.

• Mosseri emphasises the distinction between clinical addiction and problematic use.

• The trial highlights concerns over Instagram's impact on young users' mental health.